🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed new appeals had originated from mediators to resume talks with the US government. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is walking a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out stronger militarily and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Terminated

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that culminated with the American leader declaring the locations had been destroyed. Following this, Western states exercised their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could operate inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats stated repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Current Status

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be resurrected in various formats if talks reopen.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Position

In his speech to the conference, designed to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the 12-day war demonstrated the clash could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the assaults commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and cooperation, making confidence difficult to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and stays the ultimate solution to settle disputes, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and respect, they will receive a response in the identical approach."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The installations and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more resilient, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."