🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include gatherings where African descendants are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The period has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A campaign to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in educational programs. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that face all if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and adaptive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Contemporary Black History Month.